Atheism is unreasonable

[Thumpalumpacus]

Now now now, Parkers, you can't draw those conclusions without presupposing your own personal standard that you are subjecting God to, which makes it a matter of your OPINION, instead of it being a matter of fact...and do you know how I know? Because I have a difference of opinion that you, which proves my point.

Your difference of opinion is with your own holy book, and the theologians who've explicated your religion.

I will have to agree with Matthew on this one.

Yet you're defending the contrary view. When you arrive at a contradiction, one of your premises is flawed.

Only one option? I count two.

1. Accept Jesus as Lord and Savior and as a ransom for your sins and have eternal life.

I.E., give your money to the robber "of your own free will".

2. Reject Jesus as Lord and Savior and be doomed for eternity.

I.E., refuse to surrender your money, and get murdered.

You really haven't thought about what I've written here.

There are two choices, just because you choose the less pleasurable choice doesn't make it a choice nevertheless. You've been evangelized to, you've been preached to, you have open acknowledgement of Jesus Christ...all of this and you still reject him?

You have no one to blame but yourself.

So, you'd find the robber not guilty ... got it.

Tell me again about your so-called morality.

Accept Jesus as Lord and Savior and he will "know" that you've made the right choice.

Rather than preaching, answer the point, or admit your incompetence to do so.

I did, and there is no coincidence that I've never heard the term before you used it here.

Indeed ... because like any other fundy, you don't pay attention. I've been debating this subject since you were in diapers ... it's a pity your answers are so infantile.

First, define "perfect mercy".

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/def...sh/perfect

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/def...lish/mercy

I've never rejected Christian theology.

You're arguing against it in this thread. Are you so uneducated you don't realize this?

I just want an answer to my anaologies, and be spared of the rheteroic.

Science, philosophy, mathematics, and history.

Those are intellectual disciplines, not evidentiary material.

Do you need me to look up "evidence" for you as well, or can we trust you to learn how to google these things sometime this year?

There is only one Jesus Christ, and he is not I, and I am not him.

Obviously. He actually said some intelligent things here and there ... in stark contrast to you.

I'll wait while you look that up, too.

Why does the second law apply to the human body, then, Einstein?

Because the Universe seems to be a closed system ... Einstein.

Any more questions? Because my job is done here.