(November 18, 2014 at 3:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Right, and the ancestors of dogs only produced what they were. Dogs are still all of the things "above" them in their classifications (the same way that you and I are). Again, you don't seem to be disagreeing with evolutionary biology in the least.
So wolves gave rise to dogs...but a wolf is not a dog??? They are clearly the same kind of animal!!!
(November 18, 2014 at 3:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Well, neither of them can breed with dogs (different genus) so they definitely can't "reproduce after their own kind" together, or any other such nonsense (chromosome pairing issues).
I don't know why they can no longer produce...maybe so much genetic information was lost over time...the same thing with the cheetah..but that isn't the same thing as the archae (reptile to bird) changes that you people claim to have happened in the past.
(November 18, 2014 at 3:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: But, going by your conclusions "kind" must be family (since dogs, foxes, and african wild dogs are all Canids). How about humans, chimps, orangutans, and gorillas- all the same "kind"?
What I'd like to know is based on all of the diversity we see in living organisms, how the hell does that suggest we all share a common ancestor??