(November 19, 2014 at 3:48 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: [u](November 19, 2014 at 10:25 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Well..isn't that delightfully unscientific and unspecific.
Do you mean..morphology? Because that's more than just "how it looks".
And where is the standard for 'looks'? Is there a codified standard that everyone can access and use, or are you just making judgement calls based on your opinions of how various animals look?
There is no standard in my eyes...all I know is we all tend to look like the "thing" that begat us. That is why all dogs tend to look like....DOGS. You take a domestic cat and a lion...there may be an obvious size difference, but they clearly look the same..because they are the same kind of animal.
if you look at my post i proved you wrong its apart of the giant panda family that is also related to the racoon family.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>