Atheism is unreasonable

[Esquilax]

And for me, I am working on behalf of the kingdom of the living God. But my thing is this; it isn't just one argument against evolution, it is the totality of many different arguments which makes the theory virtually impossible, in my opinion...of course, I am talking about evolution without intelligent design (God).

You will still have the abiogenesis problem, the consciousness problem, the infinity problem, and the arguments that I believe refute the "evidence" presented for the theory.

How many times do you need to be told that evolution is independent from all of those things?

Each one of these problems are INDEPEDENT of the other, and in order for the theory of evolution to be true, the evolutionists would have to tear down all four problems, since all four of these issues plays a great deal into the theory as a whole...and I don't think the evolutionist will ever be able to adquately respond to EITHER problem, let alone all four together.

None of those four things, even if we accept them as actual problems, play into evolution at all. How is it that you think they do?

Abiogenesis? Life is required for evolution to occur, therefore any subject which takes place before the advent of life is not connected to evolution. Plenty of theists believe god created through the mechanism of evolution, meaning abiogenesis is a non issue for the theory.

Consciousness? An evolved trait that grants an elevated threat response system, growing in complexity over time. Or, like certain theists here believe, god granted souls to a set of pre-human hominids, giving them their advanced minds. Still not a problem for evolution, which just describes gene modification over time.

Infinity? That's an issue for cosmology, not biology. Even if god were required to resolve this issue- you seem to think so, but you misunderstand a great many topics in order to argue from ignorance on that point- god and evolution aren't mutually exclusive topics, so again, this isn't an issue.

Your evidence? Well, you haven't provided any. All you've done is made up a classification system of convenience for yourself, argued from ignorance, and cherry picked when you want certain things to apply, and when you don't Not an issue for evolution in the slightest, whatever your delusions of your position may be. So what's the mechanism that prevents gene mutations from accumulating, already?

These are serious problems that cannot be just swept up under the rug. Now, if you are REALLY opened-minded and want to see good arguments against the theory of evolution, just check out Kent Hovind...you may already be familiar with him, but he has been the most prominent anti-evolutionist that the world has ever seen...he is the William Lane Craig of anti-evolution...and his seminar's, lectures, debates have all been on youtube, and you should check him out because he has debated some pretty prominent folks in the field of biology, like Massimo Pigliucci, Eugenie Scott, Kenneth Miller, Michael Shermer (not a biologist).

Good stuff.

Kent Hovind is an absolutely despicable liar, who makes up more shit about evolution than you do. None of it sticks, of course; the fabrications of an uneducated simpleton don't automatically apply to a field of science just because that simpleton thinks they ought to, after all.