RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 31, 2015 at 7:05 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2015 at 7:07 am by Heywood.)
(January 31, 2015 at 12:01 am)Rhythm Wrote:(January 30, 2015 at 11:48 pm)Heywood Wrote: It doesn't help you get to a refutation because observations suggest that all Heywood systems require intellect. Basically your still stuck trying to come up with an observation of a Heywood system which does not require intellect to be implemented. You can't weasel out of it by claiming that reproduction is not replication.Rebranding things as "Heywood Systems" doesn't change the fact that Heywood systems don't require intellect, and haven't required intellect since the moment you brought up one of your first examples of a Heywood System.
(88, wewt)
Repeat a lie often enough Rhythm and it still stays a lie. Just admit it. Niether you nor anyone else have never presented an observation of an evolutionary systems which contains the elements: Replication, Heritiable traits, Change, and Selection which was also observed coming into existence without the need of an intellect. If such an observation was presented, it would be re-presented every third or fourth post in this thread. You guys would be continually shoving this specific observation into my face if such an observation existed. Instead you guys are continually shoving straw man refutations every third or fourth post.
