RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
February 2, 2015 at 8:37 pm
(This post was last modified: February 2, 2015 at 8:41 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 2, 2015 at 4:52 pm)Heywood Wrote: I think your point, that we aren't really talking about evolution but something else, is worthy of consideration. I just don't think it refutes the argument.
I wasn't so much trying to refute your argument as to pin down what your conclusion was. Given your recent reply, it would seem that you are arguing that the genesis of "the seed" of biological evolution likely involved intellect.
See what you think of this counter-argument:
1a. Where the operation of Heywood systems is like the operation of biological evolution, the genesis of biological evolution is probably like the genesis of Heywood systems (the "seed");
1b. Where the operation of Heywood systems is unlike the operation of biological evolution, the genesis of biological evolution is probably unlike the genesis of Heywood systems;
2. The operation of Heywood systems is like that of the operation of biological evolution in that it involves replication, heritability, change, and selection;
3. The operation of Heywood systems is unlike that of the operation of biological evolution in that Heywood systems require intellect, whereas biological evolution does not;
Conclusion 1: The genesis of biological systems probably involved replication, heritability, change, and selection. (By 1a and 2)
Conclusion 2: The genesis of biological systems probably did not involve intellect. (by 1b and 3)
Therefore, abiogenesis probably did not involve a creator. (restatement of C2)
Let me know what you think.