RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 23, 2015 at 12:08 am
(February 22, 2015 at 5:34 pm)YGninja Wrote:(February 22, 2015 at 4:55 pm)Brakeman Wrote:
There is no answer there, just a bunch of fluff from a grand high priest more engrossed in his dogma than a 6th century roman catholic chaplain.
So .. Lie ... then dodge the question about god's magic foo-foo dust, then lie again.
WWJD?
To assert that the question wasn't answered when you didn't like the answer, is dishonest enough, but you go one lie more! You pretend that science is advanced from authority. That is so dishonest because you know in your head if not your heart that Prof. Dawkins would be nothing but a Mr. Dawkins who lives in England if not for his acquired knowledge of science. He was not given the title of professor, he earned it, and his scientific respect would go out the window in a minute the moment he were found to be materially wrong. Your priests know nothing at all other than the furtherance of a dishonest con game. They claim to be anointed from a god who never speaks his own roles.
Again, I ask you, where is the evidence for the magic FOO-FOO dust your god supposedly used to make the changes in evolution that you claim can't be explained by gradual changes?
Find the cure for Fundementia!
