I did not mean to suggest that you were unaware of it. The idea of suing the owner of a private site for censoring some private individual on the private site is just so stupid from every angle. It is to be hoped that someone who needs this information will read it and realize the absurdity of their position, so that they will not bother you with their nonsense. Of course, it would be a vain hope that everyone who is unaware of such things will read it in this thread. But maybe one or two who need to be told this will read it, and maybe it will mean one or two less idiots wasting your time with their ridiculous complaints.
I know I am a guest here (being a member does not mean I own the site), and as such, I may be asked to leave at any time, for any reason, or no reason. It is not up to me to decide if I am allowed here or not. It is entirely up to the owner(s) of the site.
Just like, I may exclude a private individual from my home, if it pleases me to do so, regardless of whether they have been allowed in my home previously or not. So, too, a private site may exclude a private individual, at any time, regardless of what had been tolerated in the past.
I know I am a guest here (being a member does not mean I own the site), and as such, I may be asked to leave at any time, for any reason, or no reason. It is not up to me to decide if I am allowed here or not. It is entirely up to the owner(s) of the site.
Just like, I may exclude a private individual from my home, if it pleases me to do so, regardless of whether they have been allowed in my home previously or not. So, too, a private site may exclude a private individual, at any time, regardless of what had been tolerated in the past.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
