The argument against God

[Edwardo Piet]

I have trouble understanding how a cataclysmic or chaotic event (the Big Bang) has given rise to so much 'order' ie the 'laws' of physics e.g gravity and how this order is maintained?

Unless the laws were brought into being by the multiverse of course, and the multiverse is without time, and thereby existing forever as an uncaused cause

And of course, even if its not a multiverse you cannot just fill it with "God did it" or even "there is a reasonable chance that God did it" or even a "pretty small chance that God did it, but still a chance".

Because that would be a God of the gaps. Filling the beginning with a skyhook. If you don't understand something I think its better to wait for the evidence before you believe than to just fill it with a skyhook.

E.g to Fill it with a supernatural creator that there is no evidence of whatsoever and would have to be far far more complex and improbable than the universe itself.

Ergo, as Dawkins says:

God almost certainly does not exist.

He's a lot more improbable than pretty improbable. He's about as improbable as it can get.

And I say he because I'm sick of saying he/she/it and a lot of people consider it a he.

And I don't really see the difference between a non-existent He, She, or It.

Almost certainly of course.

Evf