RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 23, 2015 at 12:51 pm
(May 23, 2015 at 12:28 pm)YGninja Wrote: Those saying 'science self corrects', erm, no. This was corrected by pure chance. The fact is that the fraudulent data passed through peer-review and entered the Science journal with no-one so much as batting an eye.
You clearly don't understand the process of peer-review.
(May 23, 2015 at 12:28 pm)YGninja Wrote: Due to the exclusive nature of the vast majority of studies, no-one can attempt to replicate the results.
You clearly don't understand the process of replication. A laboratory doesn't have to get permission from the first experimenters in order to duplicate the experiment.
(May 23, 2015 at 12:28 pm)YGninja Wrote: How many times have we said that before with so called evolutionary 'missing links'?
You tell us. Please link to each and every instance you can find of fraud with regards to evolutionary science.