Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.

[Esquilax]

There has already been more fraud in the 'science of evolution', than all other sciences put together.

Oh, no no no no no.... there is far more fraud in a ~6000 year old earth than there is in any other 'science'.
Considering the fact that not one branch of science points to the earth being ~6000 years old.

There isn't really that much fraud on the subject of evolution anyway; as I explained, with references, the last time YGNinja made this claim, all of the examples of fraud that he could find were frauds perpetrated against the scientific community, not by it, and were generally either distrusted by a scientific community that lacked the tools to properly verify the findings, or were dismissed by the scientific community and made popular by either laymen or single scientists going against the usual standards of reportage and peer review by publishing their work in popular magazines instead. In all cases, the frauds were found out and exposed by scientists who accept evolution and not creationists, and in all cases the scientific community is on record as having major doubts about the veracity of the frauds; it is only the creationists, desperate to find anything to smear evolution, who see fit to spin these examples of the scientific method working perfectly into intentional deceit by science, when in actual fact it's anything but.

So, creationists lie, and so is YGNinja, when he makes that claim. If your arguments don't change after they've been shown to be factually incorrect, that's a lie. YGNinja is a liar.