RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 27, 2015 at 3:21 pm
Seeing these threads is so frustrating sometimes, as if one little thing like this is suddenly touted as the silver bullet that kills off the entirety of science as a field and discipline.
I know it will be hard for the OP to understand this, but really this is just further evidence of how the scientific method can help eliminate bias and fraud. Is it perfect? Nope, but then again nobody has ever claimed it is.
Duplication of results is one of the key benchmarks of a data's validity. The fact that people tried to replicate the data and failed is just an example of the system actually working and being effective and rooting out deceit.
But whatever. I couldn't really care less about what someone so illiterate in reality thinks about something far beyond his comprehension.
I know it will be hard for the OP to understand this, but really this is just further evidence of how the scientific method can help eliminate bias and fraud. Is it perfect? Nope, but then again nobody has ever claimed it is.
Duplication of results is one of the key benchmarks of a data's validity. The fact that people tried to replicate the data and failed is just an example of the system actually working and being effective and rooting out deceit.
But whatever. I couldn't really care less about what someone so illiterate in reality thinks about something far beyond his comprehension.