RE: Do you have the right to be an atheist?
July 6, 2015 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2015 at 3:45 pm by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(July 6, 2015 at 3:17 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(July 6, 2015 at 3:12 pm)pool Wrote: That definition of theism only covers the characteristics of a non-religious god because theism itself is not religion.This definition falls apart because it cannot define all the religious gods.And religion is a subset of theism.
There is no necessity to define all gods in order to understand that people with specified god beliefs fall under the heading of 'theist'.
Theism is a huge category, under which, the belief in many gods fall.
But if a set X is supposed to have only natural numbers and if a non-natural number belongs to X,that is,is an element of X.
Doesn't that mean that the definition of X is wrong?
Why do you imply that all the elements doesn't have to be natural numbers and the description of the set X as the set that consists of natural numbers would still hold in the event that an element x of X is identified as not a natural number?