RE: Best Evidence For Evolution
February 11, 2013 at 5:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2013 at 5:28 pm by popeyespappy.)
(February 11, 2013 at 4:52 pm)Zone Wrote: I think it is just about possible to argue against the neo-darwinian model of evolution based on natural selection operating on random mutations that work to create change on the phenotype or macro evolutionary scale of mult-cellular organisms. I don't think it's particularly easy to argue against it but I don't think that aspect of evolutionary theory is quite 100% concrete fact. Neither is abiogenesis even if there are some very good hypotheses on how that could have come about. Natural selection and an old Earth aged 4 billion years are hard facts that can't be argued against by anyone with a shread of some sanity.
You can argue against the sun coming up in the morning. That doesn't mean your argument is valid or sound.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.