How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :)

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: April 29, 2024, 6:48 am

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :)

bennyboy Offline

Senior Member

Religious Views: agnostic

Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation: 46

#21

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :)

May 18, 2016 at 6:26 am

Let me say this: a God which can only be argued for with logical or philosophical ideas, and not by evidence, is irrelevant. It is not interacting with Mankind since any interaction of sufficient import should provide sufficient evidence of existence.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 17, 2016 at 7:15 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 17, 2016 at 7:16 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 17, 2016 at 8:18 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Alex K - May 17, 2016 at 7:32 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 17, 2016 at 11:48 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 17, 2016 at 12:22 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 17, 2016 at 8:02 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Alex K - May 17, 2016 at 8:53 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 17, 2016 at 8:19 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 17, 2016 at 8:25 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 17, 2016 at 8:50 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 17, 2016 at 9:53 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 17, 2016 at 9:57 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Mister Agenda - May 17, 2016 at 10:00 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 17, 2016 at 10:26 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by pocaracas - May 17, 2016 at 1:03 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 17, 2016 at 1:15 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by pocaracas - May 17, 2016 at 3:04 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Aoi Magi - May 17, 2016 at 4:58 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 18, 2016 at 4:39 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by fruyian - May 19, 2016 at 7:42 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by bennyboy - May 18, 2016 at 6:26 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 19, 2016 at 8:43 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 18, 2016 at 6:53 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 18, 2016 at 12:18 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by bennyboy - May 18, 2016 at 7:35 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Aoi Magi - May 19, 2016 at 3:19 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 19, 2016 at 3:49 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Aoi Magi - May 19, 2016 at 3:52 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 18, 2016 at 1:21 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 18, 2016 at 1:24 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 18, 2016 at 1:26 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 18, 2016 at 1:36 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 7:49 am

RE: How does one respond to this - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 10:51 am

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by SteveII - May 19, 2016 at 1:44 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 19, 2016 at 1:14 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 1:49 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 1:58 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 19, 2016 at 2:14 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by SteveII - May 19, 2016 at 5:08 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 2:25 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by Neo-Scholastic - May 19, 2016 at 3:05 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by pocaracas - May 19, 2016 at 4:06 pm

RE: How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) - by robvalue - May 19, 2016 at 4:11 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Good read on consciousness	Apollo	41	2588	January 12, 2021 at 4:04 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Video thread for interesting philosophical discussions on YouTube and elsewhere	GrandizerII	2	309	August 26, 2020 at 8:43 am Last Post: GrandizerII
	Does one need to go through traumatic experience to truly appreciate living?	Aegon	27	3155	May 14, 2018 at 8:34 pm Last Post: The Valkyrie
	Why the vision argument is a very good one!	Mystic	72	7765	April 22, 2018 at 12:11 am Last Post: ignoramus
	(LONG) "I Don't Know" as a Good Answer in Ethics	vulcanlogician	69	8734	November 27, 2017 at 1:10 am Last Post: vulcanlogician
	A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it)	Mystic	179	33032	October 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm Last Post: Crossless2.0
	Interesting Study	Minimalist	2	464	October 24, 2017 at 5:07 am Last Post: WinterHold
	Very short version of the long argument.	Mystic	68	10647	September 18, 2017 at 9:38 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Why Does No One Change the Incorrect Relationship Narrative?	InquiringMind	55	6785	October 7, 2016 at 1:31 am Last Post: InquiringMind
	Interesting statistics about academic philosophy	Mudhammam	35	6664	September 18, 2015 at 10:24 am Last Post: robvalue

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me