How thick is Matt Slick?

[SteveII]

I'm not sure why you'd bother fielding arguments if you thought that fielding equivocative (but delicious!) definitions was sufficient or informative.

Tell me, would you be comfortable with my insisting upon defining knowledge in precisely that way..no matter what situation I apply it to?

Stop trying grammar now that you failed at logic...because you're going to fuck that up as well.  Logic -is- the process.  If it;s in accordance with logic...then you've done logic.  If you haven't done logic, then it's not in accordance with logic..even though you may have gotten the same answer.  Happens all the damned time, what's the problem?

Thanks for answering. I have explored the topic to my satisfaction.