RE: Questions about Debate
January 9, 2017 at 8:25 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2017 at 8:27 pm by ignoramus.)
Ultimately, all debates by their very nature require the process of logic.
Logic is based on evidence and universally agreed upon truths, eg:1+1=2, etc.
You can argue the importance of eg: benefits of religion to those in need, emotional happiness, etc using debate.
But you can't prove something unfalsifiable like a magician in the sky. Why bother?
It just becomes a pissing contest very quickly.
Logic is based on evidence and universally agreed upon truths, eg:1+1=2, etc.
You can argue the importance of eg: benefits of religion to those in need, emotional happiness, etc using debate.
But you can't prove something unfalsifiable like a magician in the sky. Why bother?
It just becomes a pissing contest very quickly.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Know God, Know fear.
