RE: Question about meaning and perception of reality from a theist.
January 9, 2012 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2012 at 12:53 pm by Ace Otana.)
(January 9, 2012 at 12:42 pm)amkerman Wrote: "redefining words does not support realities existence, it doesn't work that way"
Let's see if you're right.
Well, if we are really redefining words, then both words and "we" must exist.
If we exist, we must exist within reality.
If we exist in reality, reality must be real.
Seems you're argument is not valid.
![[Image: 1290449_o.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=gifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs3%2F1290449_o.gif)
![[Image: 1232550426_worf%20face%20palm.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=gifs.gifbin.com%2F1232550426_worf%2520face%2520palm.gif)
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
