(May 6, 2014 at 4:40 pm)Bad Writer Wrote:(May 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm)KUSA Wrote: Your president obviously agrees with this statement. Look at all the guns protecting him.
Wait...where do you live?
This really isn't a good rebuttal to MindForgedManacle's observation. Pointing out what one person decides to do for their protection (which is something Obama actually doesn't decide for himself) in no way negates the fact that gun fights get people on both sides killed. He was pointing out the flaw in a fallacious piece of rhetoric, and you have yet to properly address it without appealing to equally fallacious Strawmen. Why do you keep doing this on this thread, KUSA?
What strawman? It seems like every liberal celebrity that hates guns is surrounded by them by choice. You say the president has no choice in this well what if he did? Do you think he would say no to having guns protecting him? Fuck no he wouldn't. He would be a fool not to want them.
You are correct in saying that a gunfight tends to have casualties on both sides. The question is am I better off having one myself? Hell yea I am. It irritates me that so many people that choose not to have a gun want to strip me of mine.
Molon labe.