(March 20, 2013 at 5:18 am)mo66 Wrote: So you agree with me then! That's a real relief because it looks like a lot more Atheists on here are really really ignorant and not only that, but they're quite proud of it too. Ignorance isn't really something which is difficult to deal with, education deals with that. But when you're ignorant and also arrogant, well...
Amazing how someone as dishonest and ignorant as you can think that he has the right to call people "arrogant".
You should first start delivering actual arguments and deliver responses to arguments against you, instead of your usual whining and lying, before you can call anyone arrogant.
Quote:If somebody asks me a question about Islam, where am I going to get the answers from? Just make it up? Of course not, we get it from the Qur'an plain and simple.
If someone asks me a question about Ulysses, wheredo I get the answere from? - From the novel Ulysses.
So what! Is the fact that you can answere questions about a book because you know the book talling anything about the books truth? Or does it make that book less fictional?
NO
Quote:Not too difficult to understand. Just like if a person asks about Tom Riddle, you have to refer to Harry Potter books, or if somebody asks about "The God delusion" you have to refer to the book.
I didnt read the god delusion.
et I read quite a few science books, especialy by the behavior scientist Konrad Lorenz. The difference between a science book and your arab fairy tale is that the science book was based on observation. In Konrad Lorenz study of the behavior of tomcats he clearly discribes their movements and behavioral patterns based on years of observation.
One actualy is capable to recreate the circumstances discribed in the book and undergo the same experiment and conduct the observation abain with the same results. Meaning: the book is based on reality.
Whilest your arab fairytale is based on the epeleptic gibberish by a 6th century, narcessist, pedophile, warlord.
