Science and religion

[jstrodel]

Prove how it is morally wrong in formal logic.

Like this:

1. (self evident)
2. (self evident) if condition 1 then conclusion
===========
3. (conclusion)

If it is not already evident to you, then what good would providing a logical proof be to you? You would simply ignore it and claim that it is illogical, as you have done with everything placed before you.

In formal epistemological terms, do you think statements like "Religious people are brainwashed idiots who believe in the tooth fairy" meet the evidential standard of being self evident?

Is that what you are saying? Because if something is self evident, that means that it does not require any evidence to justify it. If you think the above statement is self evident, you are not capable of using logic.