RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
April 26, 2013 at 10:13 pm
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2013 at 10:14 pm by Ryantology.)
(April 25, 2013 at 5:20 pm)Tex Wrote: What physical evidence has told you all rational people that exist now and will exist in the future demand physical evidence?
What physical evidence has told you that physical evidence is required for truth?
What physical evidence says that the events in Boston were a travesty? (People died and were injured) What physical evidence says that dying and being injured is bad? (People don't like being injured and dead) What physical evidence says that majority opinion demands a subsequent ethic?
I have no doubt you clicked that Submit Post button feeling extremely clever. The problem with these questions is, you rely entirely on physical evidence just as we do. You justify your beliefs on two things: a book, and neurochemical reactions you interpret, in your profound ignorance, as communication from a god.
You ask us to make certain confirmations of the veracity of physical evidence, but this is dishonest. We'll accept your claims of the supernatural the moment you can conclusively demonstrate that they are real to anybody but yourself. Don't try to turn it back around on us. You're still the one making extraordinary claims you cannot demonstrate to be true. You are still full of shit until you can prove otherwise.