It seems you are not understanding the difference between...
Claim A:
1) a claim made about an actual observable, measurable, and verifiable object/concept/being/process/place/condition.
2) Has actual properties or attributes.
3) The predictions of the theory are able to reproduce accurate, measurable and verifiable results that correlate with truth.
4) Has more evidence to support it is True, rather than False. (this doesn't mean unfalsifiable)
Claim B:
1) A claim made about an object/concept/being/process/place/condition that cannot be observed, measured or verified at all.
2) Has no attributes or properties.
3) The predictions of the theory do not reproduce accurate, measurable and verifiable results that correlate with truth.
4) Has no evidence to support it is True, but rather it shares the same properties as something that would be False. (This is unfalsifiable)
Claim A:
1) a claim made about an actual observable, measurable, and verifiable object/concept/being/process/place/condition.
2) Has actual properties or attributes.
3) The predictions of the theory are able to reproduce accurate, measurable and verifiable results that correlate with truth.
4) Has more evidence to support it is True, rather than False. (this doesn't mean unfalsifiable)
Claim B:
1) A claim made about an object/concept/being/process/place/condition that cannot be observed, measured or verified at all.
2) Has no attributes or properties.
3) The predictions of the theory do not reproduce accurate, measurable and verifiable results that correlate with truth.
4) Has no evidence to support it is True, but rather it shares the same properties as something that would be False. (This is unfalsifiable)