Conflicting statements in the bible

[smax]

He didn’t sacrifice His son for meaningless objects of wrath; He sacrificed His son for His adopted children in order that He may be glorified through their redemption. I honestly believe you spent your time in church sleeping.

Not at all. You are just stuck at a point that I happened to progress beyond. As a result, I now understand the conflct inherent in my previous views.

At this point, you willingly admit that you are "intellectually" incapable of recognizing any flaws in your religious views.

You see, in the real world, divine election makes no sense because, in the real world, free will exists.

---

Then why can’t you accurately state what Calvinist’s believe?

I don't recall trying.