RE: The Jesus Shot
March 6, 2014 at 4:12 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2014 at 4:13 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 6, 2014 at 3:56 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote:(March 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You still don't get it, I specifically asked about the story that HE LINKED because I know he would never admit to being wrong. The honest answer is that the word "Christ" doesn't appear anywhere in his article, but instead of admitting it, he avoids the question altogether.No, I get that. You tried to score a cheap point by inferring that someone had made an assumption not warranted by the article. That assumption turned out to be exactly correct, so his inference that the Jesus in the article was Jesus Christ, and not Jesus the mailman, very obviously turned out to be correct.
This is really irksome to me. Somebody, in the most cynical way possible, used the name of the christ you and I believe in to make a fast buck. As Christians we should be FIRST in the queue to deplore such behavior, its the name of OUR God and OUR religion that he's dragging through the gutter. The atheists, they don't have a dog in this fight! We DO.
And yet you give him the benefit of the doubt and criticize THEM for thinking the worst of someone who is clearly as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo.
This is one reasons I find it really hard to call myself a Christian some days
my exact quote:
Quote:look I consider myself a christian, but believe religion to be evil, and can still realize this story has nothing to do with religion, just a sick individual
As you can see I clearly do not condone what he did, I'm just saying not to generalize, and by Esquilax saying and I quote "Any True Believers wish to step in to defend the good doctor", he is clearly making a generalization.
