(June 10, 2014 at 6:14 pm)mickiel Wrote:(June 10, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Losty Wrote: I don't understand why it's stubborn if you've honestly presented zero evidence. Why are you too stubborn to learn what evidence is?
To the atheist here nothing is evidence, because if they admit to just one speck of evidence, they must admit they are wrong about something and cave into god being real, something they would never do inspite of what is presented. They will energetically deny everything, like republicans go against everything Obama does.
Here's what we're looking for:
Wikipedia Wrote:Empirical evidence is information that justifies a belief in the truth or falsity of an empirical claim. In the empiricist view, one can claim to have knowledge only when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence.
All you're doing is listing off random objects as "evidence," and have not presented a coherent argument supported by what you claim to be "evidence."