RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 27, 2015 at 6:30 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2015 at 6:33 pm by bennyboy.)
(January 27, 2015 at 3:28 pm)Heywood Wrote:You still haven't explained why anyone else has to falsify your position. You have this idea that you want people to believe. You have to demonstrate that your idea represents reality. That's it. That's the end of the process. If a kid came here and made a thread that the tooth fairy was real, because you couldn't prove to her it wasn't, how would you react? Almost the same as you are being treated: first with patience, and eventually with annoyance. That's because your argument and hers are identical.(January 27, 2015 at 3:18 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Which has been done, and yet you persist...so clearly...that's not -all- it takes to satisfy.
It has not been done. Your claim that it has been done but it is just buried in this thread is like a fundamentalist claiming the proof of God is buried in the bible. Saying what you would like reality to be does not change reality.
But the problem now is that you are getting boring. You have no recourse left except to keep parrotting on about other people accepting the BOP for the negative form of your positive assertion. Unless you say something interesting or intelligent soon, you are going to lose your audience.
See, that's the problem with illogical arguments-- not that you will ever be proven wrong, but that people will stop listening to you.