The definition Atheism as disbelieving in a god is too vague - for me at least.
So you guys are basically telling me that Atheism is not rejecting the claims made by Theism?
But claiming the disbelief in god? - It doesn't make sense.
If i have a belief in a non-existent idea(god) then i am making the claim of god.
So people against have to reject my beliefs then it would be upon myself to prove the existence of god.
But what happens when people are not rejecting my beliefs but rather forming their own beliefs?
I honestly don't know.Aren't they also making a claim in doing so?
I'd be most appreciative if someone could explain what happens in this particular scenario!
So you guys are basically telling me that Atheism is not rejecting the claims made by Theism?
But claiming the disbelief in god? - It doesn't make sense.
If i have a belief in a non-existent idea(god) then i am making the claim of god.
So people against have to reject my beliefs then it would be upon myself to prove the existence of god.
But what happens when people are not rejecting my beliefs but rather forming their own beliefs?
I honestly don't know.Aren't they also making a claim in doing so?
I'd be most appreciative if someone could explain what happens in this particular scenario!