(October 30, 2015 at 1:01 pm)Rhythm Wrote:Quote:ok lets start over so i can be clear about what your hypothesisMy position is simple, neither chemistry nor physics requires a god as explanation..nor is there any evidence that a god had a hand in either. That the things which you refer to, as evidence or reason for a creator god...are, more accurately, evidence/reason for Modern Synthesis, for example. This isn't the first time I've said this.....it won't be the last.
your hypothesis : an intelligent being did not set up the laws of physics and did not set up the laws governming chemistry such laws created themselves is that correct ? if not edit
Now, do you have anything to say, to me...about -my- position?
hypothesis : neither chemistry nor physics requires a god , the laws of both created themselves . also there is no evidence that intelligent design created these laws . unintelligent Modern Synthesis created itself and is the reason for everything that exists not intelligent design
my argument is that as is well known intelligence created complex systems and puts these systems in motion . we dont require a time machine to observe this fact of reality daily . natural laws are complex , well defined , and have specific rules that govern them this is what leads me to believe intelligence set up natural laws
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you will join us And the world will be as one - John Lennon
The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also - Mark Twain
The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also - Mark Twain