RE: pop morality
February 7, 2016 at 3:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2016 at 3:29 pm by Nihilist Virus.)
(February 7, 2016 at 3:18 pm)Drich Wrote:(February 7, 2016 at 2:51 pm)Nihilist Virus Wrote: Douchrich still avoiding the question...
To clarify, you DO want to defer to a rabbi in the case of the law, but you DO NOT want to defer to a rabbi in the case of the messiah. Am I correct on this?
First explain how this is not a red herring.
How this does not change the subject in your favor
How this is not designed take the pressure off you and your failed line of reasoning and puts it one me.
Then explain if this is a red herring designed to turn the tables of the conversation why I should answer this question when clearly I have humiliated you and your failed understanding of basic Jewish law, when in fact Jewish law was the Only Subject being discussed.
See what you did?
You woke the dragon, I gave you the last word, and let you try and save face.. However you still think your smarter, even despite your repeated failures. you haven't quite yet got the idea that my spelling is not a direct correlative to my intelligence, let alone the decades I have in study, and debate on this subject. If you need a good teeth kicking I will be happy to obliged you. But first as per my request tell me why I should, when clearly I won our last debate.
Tell me why I should soundly humiliate you again? Don't think for a moment I don't have an answer to your question, I do.. and what's better the answer is painfully obvious which means your going to look like an even bigger fool than you do now...
The problem? your not committed enough to this new topic. I need a full committal from you I need to know you are full vested so when I kick your teeth in this time I get to make a big big show of it. i want to squash the virus so you need to change your name and avatar again. But, in order to do this I need you to tell me why I should bother. why should I not just rest on your last failure, and just sit back and snipe your current efforts...
Thats what you guys do. You all love being in my position where a theist makes a mistake or God forbid contradicts himself and you just hold his feet to the fire not allowing the subject matter to progress. Matter of fact that what you and a few of your friends were doing when you called me a liar for 'changing the scripture.'
So again, tell me why I shouldn't do the same.
(Here is another chance for you to just get a last word and walk away. just cuss and call me names and we can say you 'won.' because i will not respond to that.)
Red herring? I'm asking you what Deuteronomy 23:18 has to do with marriage and you cite me some bullshit website that I can't know is legitimate or not. I'm going by what the Bible SAYS. Anything else is a red herring. So please find me a collection of verses that outlaw any of the elements of heterosexual infant rape. BIBLE VERSES. In prain Engrish. If you're so sure the English version has it wrong, please explain WHY all English versions are wrong, or else find an English version that has it right.
Jesus is like Pinocchio. He's the bastard son of a carpenter. And a liar. And he wishes he was real.