(February 29, 2016 at 12:55 pm)Drich Wrote:(February 29, 2016 at 10:23 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: This is nothing more than a fallacious tu quoque argument. Whether or not we are also guilty of immorality does not prevent us from being capable of judging immorality in another. That simply doesn't follow logically.
"Moral" people killing billions of unborn babies because the parent(s) don't want that child. Who these children would grow up to be is not apart of the equation. The only question being is the baby wanted?
So, yes you can judge... I have already conceded you can judge, however you do so from a position of hypocrisy. If you want to judge God evil for killing thousands, He will inturn use your own 'standard' (As Christ did with the pharisees) and hold the world accountable by their own standard. May their be mercy if you are a hypocrite.
Again this is a "take the plank out of your eye, before you concern yourself with the speck in the eye of God."
The appeal to hypocrisy is not an affirmative defense for God. Period. That you think a veiled threat will suffice when an affirmative defense is lacking is laughable. There is no God, so your threat is empty. Just as your defense of God is empty. If God indeed has a speck (or a plank) in his eye is not negated by the fact that I have a plank in mine. That simply doesn't follow.