(March 29, 2016 at 9:23 am)drfuzzy Wrote:Do you not understand your involvement in this scientific discussion was apart of a larger 'science conspiracy' discussion from the beginning?(March 29, 2016 at 9:04 am)Drich Wrote: We don't "believe" in science. We have data. No belief required. The data is correct whether you believe it or not - until the data is improved by more data. We do not have "faith". Faith is the act of saying that you know something that you don't know.
Somebody else can address the rest of that idiotic drivel about your imaginary friend and science conspiracy fantasies.
Seriously?!?! This whole thing started because one of you claimed 'science' is not a study on fiction. That everything is always 100% Fact grounded reality, while God is not.
Which the very idea outlines my 'faith in science' argument.