(April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote:
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)
Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this.
Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is?
"Meaning a year for you". What a prick.
Look sport I take nothing for granted. You people surprise me at what you do know and floor me at what you don't.
If I mean to be insulting I will call someone stupid.
Otherwise To me it's common sense to see a number like 900 years and automatically assume that we are not using the same measure of a year, so I then look it up. But for someone like LFC it seems that she thinks the world works now as it always had. that a year now is the same as what a year would be 5000 years ago. Now if a person thinks this then it would mean they have no knowledge of any other calendar. Otherwise if they were aware of another year calendar that did not total 365 1/4 days then why not assume that this particular is not being used?
To me it is just information, what you should or shouldn't know I TRY not to judge, UNLESS one of you makes a spectacle of themselves in their own ignorance, then tries to levy that ignorance into some sort of 'high ground' (I'm better than you argument)
Then I make a great effort to 'educate uses guys.'