The Problem with Christians

[pocaracas]

You're trying to compare two completely different things.
The education system that relies on science has tons of evidence behind it.
From Newtonian physics, to chemistry, to quantum mechanics, to biology, to engineering, etc, etc. They all paint a coherent picture. One that requires no god. One where no god is apparent.
Why should a god be inserted where none has shown to be?



enjoy:
https://scholar.google.pt/scholar?q=self+assembly+amino-acids&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj7q5Pe8-_LAhWL2xoKHWj1BjkQgQMIGjAA

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22421/

Maybe you prefer a simple video? (haha.. can't get to the end... need to register... too bad)
http://study.com/academy/lesson/how-amin...otein.html

I read several of the articles but don't see how amino acid peptides self assemble into usable proteins that we see in the human body. These require complex systems to organize and self check the AA sequences in order to be usable. It is speculation to assume that these self assembling AAs observed in labs are responsible for life as we know it.

: sigh :
Weren't we dealing with abiogenesis?
Human bodies did not show up immediately after self-replicating biological molecules stepped into the picture. Why would you expect those original AAs to produce the exact proteins we have nowadays?

And yes, it will always be speculation. Even if we manage, in the lab, to go from simple molecules CO2, O2, H2, H2O, etc, to AAs, to proteins, to a self replicating entity... we will have demonstrated that the process is possible, but not that this lab-based mechanism is the one that actually happened.
So people like you will always have some wiggle room. Have fun.