@Thump
The issue here is that there is more in play here than just the inequity in standards of what is and is not considered pornographic with respect to gender differences.
No matter what we do, we are going to have to compromise on deeply held coconvictions or expose ourselves to liability. To me the ad revenue is much lesser concern - I'm not the one who pays the bills however.
It isn't and never has just been about just what is strictly legal - and in that regard, you have to consider that some overzealous prosecutor or busybody in the most conservative corner of this country could cause serious problems.
The issue here is that there is more in play here than just the inequity in standards of what is and is not considered pornographic with respect to gender differences.
No matter what we do, we are going to have to compromise on deeply held coconvictions or expose ourselves to liability. To me the ad revenue is much lesser concern - I'm not the one who pays the bills however.
It isn't and never has just been about just what is strictly legal - and in that regard, you have to consider that some overzealous prosecutor or busybody in the most conservative corner of this country could cause serious problems.
