Two Rule Updates

[Iroscato]

You will want to include all this additional information in the rule, I think, given the nature of the punishment for it.

I see perfectly well what is happening here, if we are being blunt. No other member than me, in principle, is expected to be banned as a result of it.

Ban away, my friends. Given the amount of crucial information apparently missing from this rule's body, despite its mere absence from there being misleading, I'm sure you will find a reason to ban me that isn't explicitly stated in that rule and then rectify it accordingly. Seems like a lot of trouble to go to in order to covertly induce one member in error to then be able to ban them, if you ask me, but whatever swells you people's senses of greatness, I suppose.

Again with the persecution complex. I really hate to tell you this EP (honestly, it just pains me) but nobody here cares about you that much. You are not worth 14 staff members sitting around a table, rubbing our hands with glee and cackling over our next dastardly move against you.

And it's not just because I have a monopoly on the cackling and gleeful hand-rubbing in general (which, to be fair, I do).