RE: RE: The positive case for voting Donald Trump for president.
November 6, 2016 at 8:17 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 8:18 pm by Napoléon.)
(November 6, 2016 at 5:18 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: You gotta be fuckacting with that kind of statement:
1) Inherits a big wedge from his father; check
2) Thinks he's above the law; check
3) Gets a new trophy wife every five years; check
4) Expects everybody else to pay for his fuck ups; check
5) Has a sense of entitlement a mile wide; check
6) Always thinks he's right, and only employs yesmen; check
If Drumpfuck is not establishment, then neither is Karl von Saxe Coburg und Gotha, current heir to the British throne.
As I've already explained, whether he is or isn't is besides the point. There's a group of people who think he does not represent it and they're going to vote for him on that basis. Compared to Hillary, he certainly isn't part of the political establishment.
