RE: On Moral Authorities
November 16, 2016 at 9:17 am
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2016 at 9:20 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 16, 2016 at 8:58 am)FallentoReason Wrote:(November 16, 2016 at 8:49 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: You're a fucking moron. All I said was that it was a false dichotomy and it is. Now go fuck yourself retard.
You failed to ever explicate your mysterious stance on why it's neither, you failed to recognise an argument in favour of your own position and now you fail to explicate why you don't think these are colossal fuck ups.
Learn philosophy before we speak again, because I'm not wasting time correcting your wankery.
I understand the philosophy I'm talking about unlike you.
"Neither because the gods don't exist" is a possible third horn. That makes it a false dichotomy. A true dichotomy contains the word "not". With a true dichotomy there is no third option.
It's not a position. It's a fact that if a dichotomy can be answered coherently with "neither" then it's false. You have a position. Your position is denying that a false dichotomy is a false dichotomy. And the dichotomy itself has no relevance to your incoherent failed hypothetical in the OP.