RE: Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true?
December 15, 2016 at 11:07 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2016 at 11:08 pm by bennyboy.)
(December 15, 2016 at 10:19 pm)Mudhammam Wrote:(December 15, 2016 at 9:47 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Yeh. It seems to me you could call it a singularity, or the Logos, or God, or probably a lot of other things.But saying its vague and abstract and even paradoxical does not imbue it with the psychological proclivities of a particularly self-deluded species, which is an objectively worse (because its infinitely misleading) manner of description. Same with using words embedded with historical or religious significance, such as Logos, Architect, or Creator.
It's a fine line between metaphor and misinformation, methinks. One claims only to represent ideas or ideals, and the other claims to represent truth.