(January 14, 2017 at 6:04 pm)Khemikal Wrote: There doesn't -need- to be....ofc, there is more than one take on both direct and indirect realism and some people advocating for some positions in the periphery of either position do disagree on the properties of objects or if there are, indeed..sensibly, "objects". Mostly, though, the objects are not the issue of contention.
Ask two philosophers the simplest question, you'll get 3 answers (at least).
Yeah, I think I'll be in the camp that questions whether there is an object to speak of. That seems a very subjective and observer dependent thing to me. Is a table a table to all observers (regardless of species) at all times etc.