(February 24, 2017 at 2:02 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: One way to approach religion is to say, all sects of a particular religion have no proof, and the religion itself has no proof, and all this is true because God has no proof.
Another way to approach religion is to say, if there was a god, what religion would be most probably true, and if that religion was true, which sect has proof for their stance. And you can then verify which sect would have proof for the particular religion, in which, then you would know which instance of the religion actually true represents it and hence makes the proper arguments for it.
Then you can say, what evidence does it have for humanity for the Divine Creator it presents to humanity if any at all. How does it justify faith in God in the first place? etc.. etc...
I think you guys should consider this approach.
What makes you think we haven't or that we haven't considered a still better approach? Some beliefs just can't be rescued while remaining in ones' right mind.
(February 24, 2017 at 2:02 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: The reason is as follow ..
This approach only works for people conditioned to think in authoritarian ways. I'm not running that program.
