Just in one archdiocese. Mind-boggling.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/us/26p...TE&ei=5043
But...as if 132 pervert priests wasn't enough....
The number soars over 200. And the still seem to be protecting plenty of the fuckers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/us/26p...TE&ei=5043
Quote:In an open letter, Cardinal O’Malley said he had decided to publish a list of 132 priests and two deacons “after serious and thoughtful consideration and prayer.” They include priests whom the church or courts have found guilty of sexually abusing a child, others who left the priesthood before or after accusations of abuse and dead priests who have been publicly accused of abuse.
But...as if 132 pervert priests wasn't enough....
Quote:The names of an additional 91 accused diocesan priests have not been listed. They include 62 dead priests who have not been publicly accused and 22, mostly still alive, who have not been publicly accused and could not be proved to have molested children. Cardinal O’Malley also chose not to publish the names of clergy members belonging to religious orders or other dioceses who were accused of sexual abuse while working in the Boston Archdiocese.
The number soars over 200. And the still seem to be protecting plenty of the fuckers.