North Carolina bans gay marriage

[libalchris]

Good for NC!!!!!!!!!!!!! if homosexauls want to marry then they have the opportuity to do so with opposite sex partners--JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE> They do not need special rights or privilages nor do we need to legitimize their sin.

Obvious troll is obvious; I hope.

no, he's serious. Check out his other thread: http://atheistforums.org/thread-12777.html

[Gambit]

Well, fuck me. My faith in humanity has well and truly just been raped.

[8BitAtheist]

disappointment at this stage.

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Well, fuck me. My faith in humanity has well and truly just been raped.

Mine hasn't;.dropkicks such as Tee Hee simply reinforce my innate misanthropy.

[Minimalist]

Good for NC!!!!!!!!!!!!! if homosexauls want to marry then they have the opportuity to do so with opposite sex partners--JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE> They do not need special rights or privilages nor do we need to legitimize their sin.

Fuck off, Arch....you bigot.

[Tiberius]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqKPOfOcRLQ

Also:

[Gambit]

I'm a Ron Paul fan, I don't care what anybody says... until he fucks up, like the rest of them.

[DeeTee]

Why should those who reject the normal life be granted the same benefits of the life they rejected?

Nothing good comes from homosexuality, why should they be given status just to practice their alternative preference?

The supposed concerns listed by many homosexual groups can actually be dealt with in a manner that does not usurp democracy and undermine the democratic process. They do not need to get married to fix most of the problems they say take place.

you bigot.

we are not talking about a 'race' of people but a group that wants to practice their own prefered version of sex. Get over it, there are far bigger problems in the world today than one's sexual practice.

Opposite-sex couples are the ones who have special rights, since they an get married, while others cannot.

What you forget is that the homosexual can get married. He/she just happens to reject the partner they need to marry. Their rights are not being denied, they are rejecting the right way opting for their own ideas--why should they be rewarded for that?

Why should the majority who rejected this demand lose their part of democracy just to appease a few who are spoiled and can't live by the democratic process and its results?

Why should the homosexual community be rewarded for denying the majority the democratic process and democracy?

You all have it backwards and are denying the rights of those who uphold the democratic form of government and follow its rules.

[Tiberius]

Exactly what rights are denied to heterosexual married couples with the legalisation of gay marriage? How does it affect them at all?

[Zen Badger]

Peoples rights are not subject to popular vote.

Back in the fifties and sixties the civil rights movements had to fight popular opinion in order to legalise mixed race marriages.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_mar14.htm

I suppose you think that should be banned too.

If people of your ilk had their way we'd still be burning little old ladies as witches.