Ex-Christians

[Ryantology]

Not one of you can demonstrate any defeator to any argument.

No argument insisting the existence of God is valid until God is conclusively proven to be real. He is fiction until proven otherwise.

Your refusal to accept this does not constitute a victory in debate. Sorry to break your streak. :c

[Gilgamesh]

garglemesh.

Eh, I prefer what this one woman continually called me on AF.com; Gilgamess.

[Faith No More]

Atheism is just silly.

No, this is silly...

[downbeatplumb]

That would be all Atheists ...or at least the last five or six hundred I've debated over the years.
Not one argument ever defeated - not even once.

I don't think you have been paying attention.

Every argument you have put forward has been tired, old, well refuted looonnnggg ago bollocks.

I think you like to delude yourself that you've won an argument the same way my dad does, by being loud and always saying the last thing.
This has no bearing on whether he is right or not, just that he's louder and more persistent.

[Kousbroek]

Atheism is just silly.

No, this is silly...

I think it's cute

[Whateverist]

Why bother proving the legitimacy of our conviction to a religion that would rather see us burn anyway?

Nope. not playing.

Gee That's silly. If I claim I'm Elvis Presley, does that make me authentic?

No more than claiming you are a Christian makes you authentic. I think you may be an impersonator. I've read about the teachings of Jesus and you sir, are no Jesus.

[Truth Matters]

Not one of you can demonstrate any defeator to any argument.

No argument insisting the existence of God is valid until God is conclusively proven to be real. He is fiction until proven otherwise.

Your refusal to accept this does not constitute a victory in debate. Sorry to break your streak. :c

That's obviously false.
The arguments and evidence ARE the demonstration of probable existence (ontological foundations).

Using your sloppy thinking, atoms, subatomic particles, gravity or love could not be proven real. We only know of them by evidence and experience derived from their known effects.

Sorry, but your poor reasoning skills don't defeat anything.

---

That would be all Atheists ...or at least the last five or six hundred I've debated over the years.
Not one argument ever defeated - not even once.

I don't think you have been paying attention.

Every argument you have put forward has been tired, old, well refuted looonnnggg ago bollocks.

I think you like to delude yourself that you've won an argument the same way my dad does, by being loud and always saying the last thing.
This has no bearing on whether he is right or not, just that he's louder and more persistent.

Then defeat one of them. You can't. You just claim it.

---

That would be all Atheists ...or at least the last five or six hundred I've debated over the years.
Not one argument ever defeated - not even once.

That's why I can come here and challenge all of you knowing full well that you cannot defeat anything I argue. Not one of you can demonstrate any defeator to any argument. I can pancake any silly protest you offer in clear reason.

Feigning Laughter is not an argument. Cinjin You have no argument

---

---

[Cinjin]

Feigning Laughter is not an argument. Cinjin You have no argument

Who's feigning?!? You're crackin me up.

[Minimalist]

Responses that don't answer anything are not answers.

Jesus freaks who spout bible verses as if they mean anything at all are unworthy of serious debate. Find some real fucking evidence for your godboy and we can talk.

Your "personal experiences" ( which I call "delusions") prove exactly nothing.

[Ryantology]

That's obviously false.
The arguments and evidence ARE the demonstration of probable existence (ontological foundations).

A vehement argument proves nothing, and there is no evidence to demonstrate the existence of God.

Using your sloppy thinking, atoms, subatomic particles, gravity or love could not be proven real. We only know of them by evidence and experience derived from their known effects.

We have exactly zero evidence or experience derived from the known effects of God, any more than we have evidence or experience derived from the known effects of Frodo and Samwise.

Sorry, but your poor reasoning skills don't defeat anything.

Your argument is so deliciously incompetent that it defeats itself.