I need a volunteer

[Angrboda]

You keep saying that we follow the wrong practice. You say that 40 years of Yoga has led you to where you know differently about consciousness and life. You've never been very specific about what your practice entails. If we're to follow your method, you'll at least have to tell us what it is. What does your practice look like. Do you do traditional meditation? How long and how often? Tantric meditation? What does 'Tantric meditation' as you practice it entail? You've suggested we practice intuitional science, well what activities does one perform to do that? What does your average days as a Tantra practicing 'intuitional science' look like? What intuitional science activities do you engage in during a typical week? Who did you learn these practices from? How much did you learn from Sarkar personally, as your Yogi, and how much came from other sources? What other sources did you learn from? How much time did you spend learning it, and how? If I want to learn this, what concrete steps do I need to take, and why are they important? Why will they lead me to union with the infinite?

You've babbled on for thread after thread, page after page, and have utterly failed to even give us a glimpse of tantra or intuitional science. If it is your intent to lead us to yoga and union with the infinite, you've been doing a piss poor job of it. What exactly is your intent here? Do you want us to learn intuitional science, or are you just jerking off to your own reflection?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

To be fair, Apo, if 'intuitional science' (???) leads one to be as batshit insane and as deluded as Ricky Martin here, I think I'll pass.

It'd be interesting to make a catalogue of all the un-evidenced claims Ricky has come out with thus far on the board.

He claims an illusionist is actually magical.
He claims to have healed someone of MRSA with magical thinking.
He claims to be a nurse (presumably with some sort of medical training).
He claims to know 'things' thanks to 'intuitional science' but won't say what they are who what IS even is.

Ricky says the darnedest things. We could probably start a thread just on that alone, heh.

[Whateverist]

You keep saying that we follow the wrong practice. You say that 40 years of Yoga has led you to where you know differently about consciousness and life. You've never been very specific about what your practice entails.

Right on! Spill it buddy. But listen, if it involves a lot of auto-fellatio, I'm just not all that flexible, you know. Can I get a buddy help a guy out?

[Little Rik]

You keep saying that we follow the wrong practice. You say that 40 years of Yoga has led you to where you know differently about consciousness and life. You've never been very specific about what your practice entails. If we're to follow your method, you'll at least have to tell us what it is. What does your practice look like. Do you do traditional meditation? How long and how often? Tantric meditation? What does 'Tantric meditation' as you practice it entail? You've suggested we practice intuitional science, well what activities does one perform to do that? What does your average days as a Tantra practicing 'intuitional science' look like? What intuitional science activities do you engage in during a typical week? Who did you learn these practices from? How much did you learn from Sarkar personally, as your Yogi, and how much came from other sources? What other sources did you learn from? How much time did you spend learning it, and how? If I want to learn this, what concrete steps do I need to take, and why are they important? Why will they lead me to union with the infinite?

You've babbled on for thread after thread, page after page, and have utterly failed to even give us a glimpse of tantra or intuitional science. If it is your intent to lead us to yoga and union with the infinite, you've been doing a piss poor job of it. What exactly is your intent here? Do you want us to learn intuitional science, or are you just jerking off to your own reflection.

Why should i explain you about intuitional science when you are not interested in?
There is a natural process that you like everybody else will have to go through first.
If you are happy with what you got then there is no need to learn this science, on the contrary when you are not happy with what you got at the moment and you think that you are going round and around getting nowhere then you may consider a way out.
This also implies that you understand very well that within this physical arena there can not be any progress at all so survive alone is not enough.
You want to progress but progress is not anywhere to be found physically and mentally speaking so you may realize that you will have to look elsewhere.
When you reach this stage and your thoughts are sincere then you don't have to go anywhere to search for a solution.
Your teacher will find you.

[Tonus]

Why should i explain you about intuitional science when you are not interested in?

Saw that cop out coming a mile away.

[Bob Kelso]

Blah blah blah, ludicrous dismissive reply, blah blah blah, vague rumination.

Anything new Enrico, or just the same shit?

[pocaracas]

enrico, do you think you're the first to have that idea?
If not, then where are the other guys who thought about that well before you did and have died.... ? If they didn't come back to tell you about it, then why would I accept your retelling of the same flawed thing?

[Severan]

Thousand of NDE's are not nothing boy.

Talk to someone that was dead (had a heart attack or something) and was brought back to life. After flashing through memories and going through that tunnel thing, usually there is nothing after that, just unconsciousness. Quit talking about near-death experiences. Ask people who have been dead, not almost dead.

Second, talk to medical researchers. Usually, there is an explanation. There are millions of possible explanations, yet you still pick one non-likely scenario that fits your beliefs. Just like that "Sword in the field" video.

[Bad Wolf]

Nice how you ignored me enrico, but not unexpected.
I'm going to focus on NDE's in the hope that you might address this post.
NDE's are not evidence of anything. Firstly because they are anecdotes, science does not accept anecdotes as evidence for a very good reason. How do you know the person telling the anecdote is not lying? Deluded? Or just mistaken. This isn't a rhetorical question, I want an answer to those questions from you. Please comply, it would be interesting.
And another reason why NDE's are not evidence: Even if annecdotes such as these were accepted as evidence in science, they would not be valid. Near death experiences are not 'death experiences'. Show me a person who has been dead for a week, every cell in their body has died and they come back somehow. Got someone like that? No. In every near death experience the person has not actually died, their brain may have stopped functioning temporarily but it is capable of being restarted which means they are not dead.
These points have been raised before, but just like before, I predict you are either going to ignore them or babble incoherently until the subject is changed as to avoid answering.

[Esquilax]

Enrico... I'm pretty much done. I remind you that you've presented no evidence, and in response you bring up the NDEs that I'd disproven scientifically days ago, to which your only response was "that doesn't count because they said "may be.""

It's just... it's pathetic, man. You have zero interest in doing anything more than congratulating yourself for a victory that only exists in your head, and spinning in circles to keep your delusions safe from reality by pretending you're some kind of enlightened mastermind, when you're anything but.

You're a moron, this intuitional science thing is bullshit, and by the way, you still haven't answered my questions about it from months back: namely, where can one train in it, is there a single reputable "intuitional scientist" working in the mainstream, and what peer reviewed, applicable work has intuitional science produced?

Oh right, there isn't any because you're just a delusional asshole with a superiority complex, freewheeling lies to keep pretending you're something special.