Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 12:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richard Dawkin's big blunder
RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
(March 25, 2014 at 7:36 pm)Alex K Wrote:
(March 25, 2014 at 7:30 pm)Heywood Wrote: If I was trying to burn you....you would be burned. I'm trying to get you debate honestly...that's all.

Good to see that at least your ego seems to be unfettered

I gotta big head.....that's true.
Reply
RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
(March 25, 2014 at 6:56 pm)Heywood Wrote: This is a good point on your part. Now I have asserted that every time one sees an evolutionary system whose inception is known to be the result of an intellect(without ever observing an evolutionary system whose inception is known to have resulted without the involvement of an intellect)...it increases the likelihood that all evolutionary systems require an intellect. I do recognize that the probability that all observed evolutionary systems require an intellect can never exceed the probability of the existence of the creating intellect in the first place. This is obvious.

However, If I conclude that evolutionary systems seem to require an intellect to exist, that gives me reason to believe the probability of an intellect capable of creating the evolutionary system which created us is fairly high.

So your entire position is an argument from ignorance, the basis of which being that we don't yet know the origin of an evolutionary system which began before recorded history was even possible? Seriously? Dodgy

And, again... I really hate having to repeat this point, but no, the probability that all evolutionary systems are intelligently designed does not increase the more intelligently designed systems you find, because you're working with a selection pool of unknown capacity. Seriously, I need you to retain this information, because, you know, how probabilities work is an important thing to know if you're going to keep discussing probabilities like this.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
LOL don't care about "Richard Dawkin's big blunder"

Can you show me "Dick Dawkins big dick" instead? Big Grin
Reply
RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
(March 27, 2014 at 4:47 pm)My imaginary friend is GOD Wrote: LOL don't care about "Richard Dawkin's big blunder"

Can you show me "Dick Dawkins big dick" instead? Big Grin

I can show you example where Dick's being a dick, but I guess that doesn't do it for you Tongue
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How many of you atheists believe in the Big Bang Theory? Authari 95 5293 January 8, 2024 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Richard Dawkins interviews Saudi Arabian atheist Rana Ahmad AniKoferBo 2 804 July 22, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  What are your thoughts on Richard Dawkins? NuclearEnergy 96 12975 December 6, 2017 at 3:06 am
Last Post: Bow Before Zeus
  John Lennox and Richard Dawkins TheMonster 8 2245 October 14, 2016 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: TheMonster
  Love Letters to Richard Dawkins Czechlervitz30 6 2018 July 20, 2016 at 7:37 am
Last Post: The Viking
  Richard Dawkins on Ben carson Manowar 1 1155 November 5, 2015 at 11:28 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Deepak Chopra Questions Richard Dawkins Intelligence Salacious B. Crumb 26 5638 June 7, 2015 at 4:46 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  What did you think of Richard Dawkins's old forum? TheMessiah 10 3998 June 6, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Big Name NFL Athlete Asserts his Atheism FatAndFaithless 41 14077 January 21, 2015 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Chas
  Why do you make such a big deal out of it? Fruity 14 6063 January 31, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)