Pornographic Material

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Okay Castro.

I now understand your name and how it is easier for you to be myopic in order to save your own ego amongst your fellow dictators.

I now understand how the link in your signature is nothing but a ruse and you don't really care about the rules as long as you can enforce how you feel.

Utter tosh from an utter fool.

We're volunteers. We don't run this forum as some sort of weird power trip, we run it to facilitate conversation and because we love it. I contribute money to it, as do many of the other staff and members.

I want members here to enjoy themselves but also to follow the rules. Again, this is to protect members and the forum as a whole. We're about as liberal as we can be. We don't ban people for the sake of it because otherwise we'd have no members, and subsequently no forum.

I'm sorry that you can't see this. But whatever makes you feel important.

[ShaMan]

*reads topic*
*strips off shirt*
*wipes his sweaty brow*
*takes a careful look around*
...
...
...
...
*heads to the kitchen and does the dishes topless*

Oh yeah? Here, hold my beer...

[naimless]

But the rules also say that "discussion of pornography is fine", and refers to pornographic content as including pictures, videos and links.

What you posted would not be deemed by a reasonable person to be "discussion OF pornography".

It would also not be deemed by a reasonable person to be erotica. It was hardly 50 shades of fucking grey.

I do apologise if anyone spunked their sauce whilst devouring over my humble posts.

Unfortunately I cannot be held responsible when my voluptuous terminology happens to erect the old wangadoodle of a specific moderator.

You apparently aren't aware that any decisions we make are done by staff consensus (with very, very few specific exceptions - and this is not one of them)? Someone then delivers the message. Hope this clears that up and you'll stop shitting on "specific moderators".

It's okay. I know where I stand with Castro now. He has made it clear.

Indeed just the other day I was banned for no less than a picture of milk and a slither of sarcasm.

How utterly disingenuous you appear to be. A "picture of milk", which happened to appear to be semen, accompanied by text that described it as such.

I'll further note that you were given a suspension (temp ban) because you posted it a second time after it was removed the first.

Indeed that would be why I reposted it under the HUMOUR section in my own thread...

I have had many a cleavage shot and jest flung in my direction, but I do not go crying to the policeman about it now, do I?

Perhaps I should take umbrage to any material I see that could possibly vaguely break the rules and subjectively report all of it.

Is that what you would prefer, officer?

I'd strongly suggest changing your attitude and approach with respect to this. It will not end well otherwise.

You had a goddamned post moderated. Get the fuck over it.

Well thank you for threatening me again, Cthulhu. I was simply asking a question in the QUESTION section of the forum in order to objectively discuss the boundaries of the rules. I do regret that this has been met with the most subjective hostility and I will now know my humble place not to bother your highness again.

[ShaMan]

[Cyberman]

I know he's gone and all, but:

Perhaps I should take umbrage to any material I see that could possibly vaguely break the rules and subjectively report all of it.

Is that what you would prefer, officer?

The short answer, removing the frivolously indeterminate qualifiers, is yes. Failure to report breaches of the rules is a tacit acceptance of them. Anyone who feels that a rule has been violated should be hitting that report button. Staff are as vigilant as any other member, and there's more of you lot than there are of us.

[Cyberman]

You apparently aren't aware that any decisions we make are done by staff consensus (with very, very few specific exceptions - and this is not one of them)? Someone then delivers the message. Hope this clears that up and you'll stop shitting on "specific moderators".

Here's a suggestion. How about next time we reach consensus, each and every one of the staff delivers the message? Perhaps a bulging inbox might get the point across.

[Cyberman]

You apparently aren't aware that any decisions we make are done by staff consensus (with very, very few specific exceptions - and this is not one of them)? Someone then delivers the message. Hope this clears that up and you'll stop shitting on "specific moderators".

It's okay. I know where I stand with Castro now. He has made it clear.

Clearly not.

[Tonus]

Perhaps a bulging inbox might get the point across.

Is that an in-box in your pocket, or are you just 'messaging' me?

[ShaMan]

Perhaps a bulging inbox might get the point across.

[Mystical]

What the hell!?! I missed the fall of the nameless???

I can't technically say I told you guys, butttt.. I told you guys

I for one, will not miss the grouchy sniveller.

Good game! *taps mods butts