Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 11:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Christoid Logic
RE: Christoid Logic
Wyrd of God:
Quote:The BBT = a silly theory of creation cooked up by a silly Catholic priest.


I doesn't matter who first proposed BBT, it was for decades the most logical theory to explain what was unmistakably observed by astronomers. They could see long-extinct stars converging, relative to their own position in time, back toward a much narrower point in time. They can even see beyond the stars to a point where there was only gas clouds, and further out where much simpler matter existed. None of this provided a certain explanation as to how it all began, therefore the singularity is just a weak hypothesis, and may be soon phased out as new technology and methodology permits better theories to explain what Franky doesn't want you to think about, but the whole report did from the start make the Vatican thugs shit their pants in fear on account of what it all implied. priest or no priest, BBT was never a Catholic idea!

WOG, you truly are as weird as your screen name implies, but it's hard to believe you are really that ignorant. Do you have a point with brain-droppings such as this, or are you just really insane?
Mr. Hanky loves you!
Reply
RE: Christoid Logic
(February 19, 2016 at 3:06 am)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Wyrd of God:
Quote:The BBT = a silly theory of creation cooked up by a silly Catholic priest.


I doesn't matter who first proposed BBT, it was for decades the most logical theory to explain what was unmistakably observed by astronomers. They could see long-extinct stars converging, relative to their own position in time, back toward a much narrower point in time. They can even see beyond the stars to a point where there was only gas clouds, and further out where much simpler matter existed. None of this provided a certain explanation as to how it all began, therefore the singularity is just a weak hypothesis, and may be soon phased out as new technology and methodology permits better theories to explain what Franky doesn't want you to think about, but the whole report did from the start make the Vatican thugs shit their pants in fear on account of what it all implied. priest or no priest, BBT was never a Catholic idea!

WOG, you truly are as weird as your screen name implies, but it's hard to believe you are really that ignorant. Do you have a point with brain-droppings such as this, or are you just really insane?
Which belief is more asinine?  The belief in a creator deity or the belief in the BBT?
Reply
RE: Christoid Logic
(February 19, 2016 at 3:32 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:
(February 19, 2016 at 3:06 am)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Wyrd of God:


I doesn't matter who first proposed BBT, it was for decades the most logical theory to explain what was unmistakably observed by astronomers. They could see long-extinct stars converging, relative to their own position in time, back toward a much narrower point in time. They can even see beyond the stars to a point where there was only gas clouds, and further out where much simpler matter existed. None of this provided a certain explanation as to how it all began, therefore the singularity is just a weak hypothesis, and may be soon phased out as new technology and methodology permits better theories to explain what Franky doesn't want you to think about, but the whole report did from the start make the Vatican thugs shit their pants in fear on account of what it all implied. priest or no priest, BBT was never a Catholic idea!

WOG, you truly are as weird as your screen name implies, but it's hard to believe you are really that ignorant. Do you have a point with brain-droppings such as this, or are you just really insane?
Which belief is more asinine?  The belief in a creator deity or the belief in the BBT?

I don't know more of particle physics than what I've gleaned from popular books, and then you don't give a more knowledegable impression on that. So between two dummies, what part of BBT looks asinine to you? I'd really like to know.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Satirical logic for the atheistic mind Drich 158 18184 June 13, 2018 at 9:22 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  What is the logic in "life after death"? Fake Messiah 52 8093 March 11, 2017 at 6:43 pm
Last Post: comet
  divine logic? ignoramus 30 6136 June 26, 2015 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: Godscreated
  God's Special Logic Michael Schubert 16 3360 March 31, 2014 at 5:06 pm
Last Post: Ryantology
  'Logic' Window: The Nutrition Of Wisdom Cyberman 0 1224 April 20, 2012 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Logic problem: The founding principles of the U.S. and Christianity. Ziploc Surprise 45 26221 February 13, 2012 at 2:09 am
Last Post: Ziploc Surprise
  Logic vs. Facts... aufis 35 15547 June 6, 2010 at 7:24 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  First Order Predicate Logic vs The Judeo-Christian creator pack3tg0st 14 6555 April 8, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)