Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 8:24 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
#91
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 4:38 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Can someone point out to me when the cause of something has been discovered to actually be supernatural, coz if that has never happened I am putting all such explanations for things in the can be safely ignored file.

You give a consistent definition of "supernatural" first, because honestly, I don't really understand what the word means.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#92
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 4:41 am)Alex K Wrote: You give a consistent definition of "supernatural" first, because honestly, I don't really understand what the word means.

And while we're at it - if "supernatural" things were to exist, wouldn't it stand to reason, that there should also be "subnatural" ones? Nobody ever talks about those... Tongue
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
#93
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 5:02 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:
(May 7, 2016 at 4:41 am)Alex K Wrote: You give a consistent definition of "supernatural" first, because honestly, I don't really understand what the word means.

And while we're at it - if "supernatural" things were to exist, wouldn't it stand to reason, that there should also be "subnatural" ones? Nobody ever talks about those... Tongue

What? People talk about Donald Trump all. the. time.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#94
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 4:38 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Can someone point out to me when the cause of something has been discovered to actually be supernatural, coz if that has never happened I am putting all such explanations for things in the can be safely ignored file.

I think there's an inherent problem. If anything is shown to be supernatural, a cause or otherwise, then it's not supernatural. It's detectable in some way by our primitive natural science. If the cause hasn't been detected, then it has just been assumed.

I agree with Alex, I don't know what the word is meant to mean. It just seems to be not just an argument from ignorance, but an appeal to it. "Stuff we don't understand."
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#95
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
[Image: 13qr1r.jpg]
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#96
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 5:22 am)ignoramus Wrote: [Image: 13qr1r.jpg]

So he was behind the LHC breakdown! Makes sense...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#97
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
Oh yeah, people think we can somehow "rule out all natural causes".

Even any potential ones we can't detect yet, or may never detect. What utter bullshit. We can speculate that may be the case, but what's the point? A few years later when the answer comes along, what did we gain by guessing and sticking Jesus into the gap?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#98
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 5:28 am)robvalue Wrote: Oh yeah, people think we can somehow "rule out all natural causes".

Even any potential ones we can't detect yet, or may never detect. What utter bullshit. We can speculate that may be the case, but what's the point? A few years later when the answer comes along, what did we gain by guessing and sticking Jesus into the gap?

What is an unnatural cause though?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#99
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
I have no idea about that either. No one has given me a sensible definition. They usually try and default to dictionary definitions, which involve what people know. So something can be un/supernatural to one person and not to another. Fucking ludicrous.

When they're embarrassed to say "magic", which is what they really mean, it gets painful. But magic is equally poorly defined anyway.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 7, 2016 at 5:52 am)robvalue Wrote: I have no idea about that either. No one has given me a sensible definition. They usually try and default to dictionary definitions, which involve what people know. So something can be un/supernatural to one person and not to another. Fucking ludicrous.

When they're embarrassed to say "magic", which is what they really mean, it gets painful. But magic is equally poorly defined anyway.

Any definition of the word which would have rendered electrical lawn mowers and toasters "supernatural" 200 years ago is not very interesting, let alone radio waves.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is it possible that the universe could be eternal??... dave4shmups 145 16711 August 9, 2023 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The Universe Is Not Locally Real Foxaèr 52 5196 December 31, 2022 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Infinite Universe? JairCrawford 13 1177 May 4, 2022 at 5:17 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Now we know when the first stars in the universe switched on Foxaèr 1 408 June 28, 2021 at 6:47 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  Another universe existed before ours Foxaèr 27 2470 November 29, 2020 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Watching a show "How The Universe Works" Brian37 13 1872 July 24, 2018 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Inflation without a beginning: a null boundary proposal Jehanne 7 928 May 30, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Total stars in Universe is rougly equal to the total number (ever) of human cells. Jehanne 39 6302 May 24, 2018 at 6:05 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  An infinite, beginningless and eternal Universe is taken seriously by scientists. Jehanne 20 3915 March 18, 2018 at 11:04 am
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  What Does Gravity Have To Do WithThe Expanding Universe? Rhondazvous 42 6043 February 26, 2018 at 8:14 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)