Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News

[LastPoet]

From the top of my head: womens reproductive rights and the wage gap. Altough the latter is almost non existent on some of the more civilized countries.

And I am not going to present info that is within the few letters typed on google. Try to look at scientific data, instead of alt right provocateurs and breitbart.

To argue with you is as useful as arguing with a pigeon. I doubt you have the ability to even try to understand data, given your lack of the most simple logic.

Try

"Worldwide wages by gender"
"Woman reproductive rights"

And

"how to cook my own ass"

[abaris]

You know what? I'll give you even more wiggle room: Name one thing feminists can back up with actual strong evidence?

Everything LP just said. To not being aware of that is either being disingenous or putting the fingers in your ears and shout la, la, la, I can't hear you.

Are we in Twilight zone or are there really dinosaurs walking the land, so not interested in wage gaps and other ways women still are treated like second grade citizens, that they not notice.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

From the top of my head: womens reproductive rights and the wage gap.

Everything LP just said. To not being aware of that is either being disingenous or putting the fingers in your ears and shout la, la, la, I can't hear you.

1) No feminist has ever produced any actual strong evidence of wage gap other than "buh buh but the patriarchy!!!(which ironically has no evidence either)".
2) Wage gap has already been debunked. What you mean is called an "Earnings gap" and there is no proven correlation of it with gender discrimination.
3) What do you mean feminists have produced evidence for "Women reproductive rights"? You'll have to actually provide some substance rather than just drop a few words.

[Jackalope]

I believe the phrase "What's good for the Goose is also good for the Gander" applies.

Or to sound like Minimalist: "To hell with him".

I believe "fuck that guy with a rusty rake" is also apropos.

[abaris]

3) What do you mean feminists have produced evidence for "Women reproductive rights"? You'll have to actually provide some substance rather than just drop a few words.

Or you might take your head from your ass, take a breath of fresh air and have a look around. Starting at your doorstep and the different state legislations. Then, you could get adventurous and take a look at other nations and what happens there. And no, I don't mean islamic ones but so called western ones. Such as Poland or Hungary.

Is that too much to ask? Doing your own homework instead of kissing Milo ass for providing you with confirmation bias?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

3) What do you mean feminists have produced evidence for "Women reproductive rights"? You'll have to actually provide some substance rather than just drop a few words.

Or you might take your head from your ass, take a breath of fresh air and have a look around. Starting at your doorstep and the different state legislations. Then, you could get adventurous and take a look at other nations and what happens there. And no, I don't mean islamic ones but so called western ones. Such as Poland or Hungary.

Is that too much to ask? Doing your own homework instead of kissing Milo ass for providing you with confirmation bias?

Be more specific. Do you mean lack of abortion rights? Because I don't support endangering the life of the baby or the mother unless the life of the baby or the mother is at risk. If you tell me that I'm wrong about not supporting feminism I'll want to know your reasons, simply asking to do my own homework is not fair, you have to present your case also.

[abaris]

If you tell me that I'm wrong about not supporting feminism I'll want to know your reasons, simply asking to do my own homework is not fair, you have to present your case also.

Life's unfair and too short to explain everything in detail to every wayward pocket macho. Especially the obvious, which can be reveiled by a simple google.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Or you might take your head from your ass, take a breath of fresh air and have a look around. Starting at your doorstep and the different state legislations. Then, you could get adventurous and take a look at other nations and what happens there. And no, I don't mean islamic ones but so called western ones. Such as Poland or Hungary.

Is that too much to ask? Doing your own homework instead of kissing Milo ass for providing you with confirmation bias?

Be more specific. Do you mean lack of abortion rights? Because I don't support endangering the life of the baby or the mother unless the life of the baby or the mother is at risk. If you tell me that I'm wrong about not supporting feminism I'll want to know your reasons, simply asking to do my own homework is not fair, you have to present your case also.

So you think it's okay for the government to regulate what a woman may do with her body, and don't think feminists should be complaining about it. Got it.

Tell us again how you're not anti-women?

[Amarok]

Oh no thumb  according to pool .If women have sex then they need to be punished because they made a choice .And they only get to control there bodies if it doesn't kill the embryo .But it gets to highjack here body to sustain itself against her will and possibly kill her  . And the only say she gets is to have sex or not just like it's her fault if she gets a STD . The embryo didn't choose to exist  so it gets to parasite off her.  Yup nothing anti woman here.

---

Oh no thumb  according to pool .If women have sex then they need to be punished because they made a choice .And they only get to control there bodies if it doesn't kill the embryo .But it gets to highjack here body to sustain itself against her will and possibly kill her  . And the only say she gets is to have sex or not just like it's her fault if she gets a STD . The embryo didn't choose to exist  so it gets to parasite off her.  Yup nothing anti woman here.

Oh and even if you spent all day listing the mountain of reason why feminism is right and Milo and the MRA are morons Pool will just go LA LA not listening. He's an MRA fanatic are par with being a creationist. And just like a creationist it's not our job to educate his sorry ass. It's his job to know his shit before spouting off.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

I don't support endangering the life of the baby or the mother unless the life of the baby or the mother is at risk.

So you think it's okay for the government to regulate what a woman may do with her body, and don't think feminists should be complaining about it. Got it.

Tell us again how you're not anti-women?

That has got to be one of the most idiotic rebuttal to my position.

The government has the power to regulate the body of the citizens, not that it is fair but it is what it is. The fact that you're not allowed to beat someone to death is the government imposing standards on what you can or cannot do with your body. There are many many more instances of the government telling you what you can or cannot do with your body.

---

Oh no thumb according to pool .If women have sex then they need to be punished because they made a choice .

No.

And they only get to control there bodies if it doesn't kill the embryo .

They just don't get to kill the baby.

But it gets to highjack here body to sustain itself against her will

Tough shit. Actions have consequences and biology isn't fair.

and possibly kill her .

Read my position again:

I don't support endangering the life of the baby unless the life of the baby or the mother is at risk.

I do support abortions in cases where the life of the mother is at risk.

And the only say she gets is to have sex or not

Don't women already have a myriad of options to not get pregnant? Not my problem.

it's her fault if she gets a STD .

Nope.

The embryo didn't choose to exist so it gets to parasite off her.

Yes.

Yup nothing anti woman here.

Only common sense.

Oh and even if you spent all day listing the mountain of reason why feminism is right and Milo and the MRA are morons Pool will just go LA LA not listening.

You know what? I would be GLAD to see this huge list of the mountains of reasons. If by the "mountains" of reasons you mean:

From the top of my head: womens reproductive rights and the wage gap.

Then we're already past that.

He's an MRA fanatic are par with being a creationist.

I am willing to look at evidence and you have none - who's on par with creationists again?

And just like a creationist it's not our job to educate his sorry ass.

Right. And it's not because you can't back at least a single one of your claims with evidence.

It's his job to know his shit before spouting off.

So you don't really have any substance or evidence to prove me wrong: I'm just wrong. Tell me again how I'm on par with creationists.